The Guildford pub bombings occurred on 5th October 1974. The Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) offers effectively detonated two bombs in two diverse public homes in Guildford. Those pubs had been chosen due to its British Army staff. Bombings killed four soldiers, one civilian and wounded 65 people.

The Police faced massive pressure to recognize and arrest PIRA bombers. Two months later, in December 1974, police arrested the Guildford Four:

Gerry Conlon

Paul Hill

Patrick Armstrong

Carole Richardson

There had been convicted for bombings and use 15 years in the prison. The prosecution relied only on their confession as the key evidence. However, the Guildford’s confessions were collected under pressure and by coercion. It included torture, threats against the family, 48 time of detention, certainly not recording the data supporting the witness assertion and his alibi. The circumstance was investigated once again by the authorities and new evidence came into account. The main one of detectives located a typed take note from the one of ‘interviews’, which were edited, improved and deleted down the road by the police through the first investigation.

It can be figured the police manipulated with evidences to present the case because they wanted to. The Guildford Four had been released in October 1989 and their conviction was quashed (Carrabine, Cox, Lee, South and Plummer 2008, Moisidis 2008, Reiner 2000, Rozenberg 1994, Savage and Milne 2007 and Whitton 1998).

The part of criminal investigation techniques in miscarriages of justice and their impact

Misconduct is a wide topic and can be described as a considerable breach of duty and trust. It can incorporate violence, fraud, theft, sexual harassment, gross incompetence, distorting and destroying data, serious negligence, drug make use of and working, perjury and discrimination (Punch 2009).

In more specific perception, misconduct of police actions could be defined and connected with breaking the inner disciplinary regulations. As a result of occupational culture, there are lots of available prospects for misconduct during the criminal investigation. Police officers have to offer on the daily basis with duties that make aggression and violence. If indeed they make an error within their judgment, that may lead to overreaction. The various types of misconduct incorporate: corruption, brutality and deviance (Mollen Commission 1994 and Punch 2009).

Miscarriages of justice in the majority of the conditions are linked and discovered with wrongful convictions (Savage and Milne 2007). They happen when the innocent person has been convicted for the criminal offense that he/she didn’t commit, the right verdict has not been said, as there was a denial of the truth (Kyle 2004 and Nobles and Schiff 2000).

The primary types of miscarriages of justice involve:

Fabrication of evidence,

Allegation of intimidation and violence during interrogation,

Unreliable identification of an offender by the authorities or witnesses,

Unreliable expert evidence,

Unreliable confessions caused by police pressure or the vulnerability of suspect,

Non-disclosure of proof by the police or prosecution,

The conduct of the trial,

Problems connected with appeals procedures (Savage and Milne 2007 and Rothlein 2008).

From the other hands, miscarriages of justice ware in most cases associated with Irish terrorism in the 1970’s (Mullin 1990). In that time, cops would view it as a moral duty for miscarriage of justice to justify better good for society (Punch 2009).

That was also the timeline when situations of the Birmingham Six, the Gunros Three, the Guildford Four, the Bridgewater Four, the Maguire Seven, Judith Ward or John Joseph Boyle, came to light that described miscarriages of justice to network and legal system (Reiner 2000).

In the case of the Guildford Four’s, the ‘confession’ was taken under great pressure and coercion, it had been also the only one evidence that located them guilty. From the law enforcement’s points of viewpoint, the key concern and aim through the criminal investigation has been to obtain a confession from the main suspect.

Traditionally, police officers tend to start to see the confession as the bedrock of the criminal investigation and warranty to the successful case in the court where the guilty conviction can be offered (Maguire 2003 and Sanders and Young 2003).

The importance of ethics and morals to criminal investigative processes

Ethical policing is founded on the universal anticipations of procedure and behaviour that administrate basic principles norms of human interactions with others. Ethical policing will not concentrate on morality of cops and the institution of policing; it refers to morality that is reflected through selection of roles and various institutional needs. Ethical policing is not straight concentrated on the morality of police officers in their private life, nonetheless it is concentrated on the way they act and react when providing police services working (Kleinig2009).

Miscarriages of justice negatively have an effect on the process of criminal investigation. Even so, the nature and part of ethics in the control of policing powers and policing process was among the major advancements in policing through the recent years (Wright 2007).

The compromise between the high ethical criteria and ideals of criminal investigation is typically labelled as the ‘noble cause corruption’ statement which links carefully with miscarriages of justice and the criminal investigation (Reiner 2000).

Traditional corruption can be determining as misuse of the professional position, usually abuse of the positioning of trust and power, which aims to attain economic, sexual or elsewhere personal gains.

‘Noble trigger corruption’ is more dangerous kind of corruption then traditional corruption, even though is less obvious. It can involve wide variety of various kinds of cops, both rotten apple and the golden apple.

‘Noble cause corruption’ sometimes appears as a mindset which allows to belief that ‘the ends justify the means’ and for the greater good of the contemporary society. It is the ethical dilemma between the process of solving the circumstance or marketing campaign results (Bayley 2010 and Crank and Caldero 2004).

This can describe that closed mindsets and stereotypical perspective about suspects during the criminal investigation process and miscarriages of justice will be closely linked (Savage and Milne 2007). In a few extreme cases it is possible to see cops who act and started to be as a full-period criminal because of their unethical and misconduct of actions (Leuci 2004).

Corruption in policing occurs when police officers care an excessive amount of about their work plus they become emotionally involved with process of taking ‘bad guys’ of the roads. Their judgments turning out to be subjective based on their emotions. They believe their inappropriate action will end up being justified with the positive and successful end result (Crank and Caldero 2004).

Miscarriages of justice happen to be foundation on doubtful convictions, but the other region of miscarriage of justice with regards to criminal investigation closure takes on significant role – problematic activities, that cause the miscarriage of justice at the initial place (Savage and Milne 2007).

In circumstance of the Guildford Four it was fabrication of evidence about suspect’s innocence and his alibi to arrest and demand others. They also experienced intimidation, torture, threats about their friends and family and offering fabricated confession from the witness.

Actions of the authorities officers aimed at investing in prison people in charge of the death of 5 and wounding of 65, nonetheless it shouldn’t be done through all available costs.

It is necessary to say, that no matter how appealing and tempting, it is always against the law to break the guidelines for greater good. The opposite way of thinking will be expose the misuse of the positioning of authority and ability, it would as well undermine the trust and in addition affect public independence and liberty (Rothlein 2008 and Savage and Milne 2007).

The importance of the professionalization of criminal investigations

Police professionalization can be defined as the process by which policing actions became a profession. Police professionalization can be described by following characteristics:

It is an organised body of knowledge that’s frequently improved,

Involved a prolonged training,

Offers the best service to its clientele,

Functions at first and controls its users,

Creates its network of fans through professional requirements,

Inflicts a compulsory code of ethics and behaviours,

Provides universal expectations of practice,

Provides total professionalism (Lanyon 2009).

Policing professionalization will only achieve success if its main function will be understanding, rather than performing as political, organizational and monetary agency. It implies that the bigger education and continuous development is another method of training the officers.

However, counter-argument for law enforcement professionalization is that the backdrop and the type of policing require officers to handle ‘dirty jobs’ that require a physical dimension. It will be more useful to contain muscular and brave officers, instead of educated and brainy officers (Lanyon 2009 and Stelfox 2008).

The organised overall body of knowledge must provide training and evidence-based research predicated on integrated proficiency reinforced by the practice among police officer (National Center for Policing Excellence 2005).

The role of police is complex and diverse, but hardly ever motionless and inactive. Likewise if police will not be in a position to deal with

complex and intellectually complicated characteristics of policing, then they will have to face routine and normal side of the police occupation (Lanyon 2009, Stelfox 2007 and Stelfox 2008).

The connection between miscarriages of justice and reforms of professionalization methods are direct. The primary examples include:

Protection for person under interview (Fisher 1977 and Zander 1995),

Right to communicate with a solicitor (Fisher 1977),

The recording of the interview with suspect (Sekar 1997),

The good treatment of young persons and mental disordered persons (Fisher 1977).

The protection for individuals when interviewing will stop cops from using force and coercion, threats and/or torture to receive statement. This and the right to communicate with a solicitor were the primary considerations of Philips Commission and are fully covered by the Police and Criminal Evidence Take action 1984. The recording of the interview with a suspect is also the central aspect of the Police and Criminal Evidence Action 1984.

In 2005 the Association of Chief Police Officers launched Police Reform Work 2002, which included program on the Professionalizing the Investigative Process (PIP). PIP’s goal was to develop the investigative method through training, improvement and expansion of cops who are involved in the criminal investigation method (National Center for Policing Excellence 2005).

The function of the state with regards to criminal investigation

The function of the state is really important when involves the criminal investigation procedure. The Work of Parliament settings and regulates police powers in England and Wales to overcome crime and presented codes of practice, was made in 1984, the authorities and Criminal Evidence Take action 1984.

PACE is principally concentrated on:

The police powers to find an individual, premises or a car without making an arrest initial,

Need to make a record of an end or encounter,

Powers to gain entry to those premises,

The handling of things seizes form those queries,

The treatment of suspects in custody,

Handling of detention,

interviewing the suspect,

recording the interview,

identification of people in relation to investigative offences,

keeping of correct and reliable criminal records,

powers of arrest,

Terrorist situation,

The specific legislation covering the conduct of criminal investigation can be contains in the Criminal Methods and Investigative Act 1996 (Home Office 2010, Kyle 2004, Sekar 1997 and Zander 1995).

In conclusion, the Police and Criminal Evidence Work 1984 aims to generate the balance between police powers in England and Wales and rights of the users of the public.

The supervision, administration and investigation of ordinary criminal investigation and that of a critical incident

Critical incident can be described as any event in which usefulness and effectiveness of the policing response is expected to have important and key effect on the self-confidence of the victim, victim’s family and the community.

The main focus on critical incidents was made by the Stephan Lawrence Inquiry. However vital incidents were component of policing and criminal investigation since its beginning. Also it is necessary to improve and keep maintaining stability and rely upon policing in those situations, as public distinguish police intentions through actions, response and priorities (Alison and Crego 2008 and Grieve 2008).

The main three characteristics of the crucial incident are:

Fast-time pressure to resolve the case,

partial details about the incident,

Quickly changing state of incident.

Those problematic qualities make critical incidents significant, tricky and difficult to control. It involves a knowledge of the condition and complication of the incident.

The decisions are mostly taken under great pressure in doubtful, undecided and unproven surrounding.

Managing of important incidents can be unhelpfully affected by:

Failure of the communication with the victim,

Collapse of interaction with family and network,

Lack of appropriate conversation with other officers,

Real or perceived policing,

Mistakes with undertaking the investigation (Alison and Crego 2008 and Grieve 2008).

To avoid inability during investigating a crucial incident, it is necessary to follow earlier prepared plan:

It can include creation of operational concerns to set up minimum specifications of control,

Creation of groups predicated on management structures to cope with different problems concurrently and look at the prior findings from the various perspective,

Offer an suggestions to the relatives or a victim by family members liaison officers as the reinsurance about police activities, response and priorities,

Look at the several events can be experienced by different communities,

Keep records and justification of any decisions and adjustments made during the conflict incident,

Debrief offices about current situation and progress of the incident (Alison and Crego 2008 and Grieve 2008).

In the other thoughts, the vital incident can have horrible, catastrophic and tragic outcomes for police, victim or victim’s family and community if was handled badly (Newburn, Williamson and Wright 2007).

Management and supervision during the normal, low-profile circumstance differs from the essential incident’s style. Criminal investigation management could be divided into different way of managing and guidance of the incident (Harfield, 2008).

Intelligence-Led Policing (ILP) is usually exhibit through theory in The National Intelligence Model (NIM). This form of management is used to determine which crimes should be investigated and by whom or different more appropriate interventions. The ILP transmit NIM to investigate the main perception of informing holistic, by firmly taking no notice of volume level crime performance.

The Statutory Framework of Investigative Powers features pre-arrest and post-arrest investigation actions towards the normal incident. Both of those activities are protected by Human being Rights from misuse of point out powers and support of investigatory decisions.

Managing Evidence will involve citizen’s cooperation and make use of coercive powers to collect relevant material.

Management of Key Solutions is closely linked with managing of data and securing the data. Key resources could be collected from personnel (e.g. forensic scientist, pathologists or behavioural psychologist) and include use of different abilities (e.g. interview skills, detective expertise or house-to-house inquire).

Management and guidance of key resources includes going for a statement, reading a affirmation, searching the crime scene, interviewing the suspect and victim (Harfield, 2008).


Alison, L. and Crego, J. (2008) ‘Policing Essential Incidents: Leadership and Significant Incident Management’, Willan Publishing

Bayley, B. (2010) ‘Noble cause corruption: Carry out the ends justify the means?’, (accessed on 08/11/2010)

Caldero, M. A good. and Crank, J. P (2004) ‘Police Ethics: The Corruption of Noble Cause’, Anderson Publication

Carrabine, E, Cox, P, Lee, M, South, N. and Plummer, K. (2008) ‘Criminology: A Sociological Introduction’, Second Edition, Routledge

Fisher, sir H. (1977) ‘ The Conflict Case: Survey’, London: HMSO

Grieve, J. (2008) ‘Vital Incidents’ in Newburn, T. And Neyround, P. (eds.) ‘Dictionary of Policing’, Willan Publishing

Harfield, C. (2008) ‘Criminal Investigation’ in Newburn, T. and Neyround, P. (eds.) ‘Dictionary of Policing’, Willan Publishing

Home Business office (2010) ‘The Law enforcement and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and accompanying codes of practice’, (accessed on 08/11/2010)

Kleing, J. (2009) ‘Ethical Policing’ in Wakefield, A, and Fleming, J. ‘The Sage Dictionary of Policing’, Sage

Kyle, D. (2004) ‘Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: The purpose of the Criminal Cases Review Commission’, Drake Laws Review, Volume 52

Lanyon, I actually. (2009) ‘Professionalization’ in Wakefield, A, and Fleming, J. ‘The Sage Dictionary of Policing’, Sage

Leuci, R. (2004) ‘All the Centurions’, NY: Harper Collins

Maguire, M. (2003) ‘Criminal Investigation and Crime Control’ in Newburn, T. (eds.) ‘Handbook of Policing’, Willan Publishing

Moisidis, C. (2008) ‘Criminal Discovery: From truth to proof and back again once again’, Institute of Criminology Press

Mollen Commission (1994) ‘The City of New York of Corruption and the Anti-Corruption Procedures of the Police Department’, NY: City of New York

Mullin, C. (1990) ‘Mistake of Judgment: The truth about the Birmingham bombings’, Dublin: Poolbeg

National Centre for Policing Excellence (2005) ‘Practice Advice on Core Investigative Doctrine’, Wyboston: NCPE

Newburn, T, Williamson, T. and Wright, A. (Eds.) (2007) ‘The Handbook of Criminal Investigation’, Willan Publishing

Nobles, R. and Schiff, D. (2000) ‘Understanding Miscarriages of Justice: Laws, the press and the inevitability of a crisis’, Oxford: Oxford University Press

OPSI (2006) ‘The Police and Criminal Evidence Action 1984’, (accessed on 08/11/2010)

Punch, M. (2009) ‘Misconduct’ in Wakefield, A, and Fleming, J. ‘The Sage Dictionary of Policing’, Sage

Reiner, R. (2000) ‘The Politics of the Law enforcement’, 3rd edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press

Rothlein, S. (2008) ‘Noble Cause Corruption’, Public Agency Training Council

Rozenberg, J. (1994) ‘The Search for Justice’, London: Sceptre

Sanders, A. and Young, R. (2003) ‘ Police Powers’ in Newburn, T. (Eds.) ‘The Handbook of Policing’, Willan Publishing

Savage, S. P. and Milne, B. (2007) ‘Miscarriages of Justice’ in Newburn, T, Williamson, T. and Wright, A. (Eds.) (2007) ‘The Handbook of Criminal Investigation’, Willan Publishing

Sekar, S. (1997) ‘Fitted In: The Cardiff Three and the Lynette Light Inquiry’, London: The Built in Project

Stelfox, P. (2007) ‘Professionalising investigative procedure’, in Newburn, T. (eds.) ‘Handbook of Criminal Investigation’, Willan Publishing

Stelfox, P. (2008) ‘Professionalization’ in Newburn, T. and Neyround, P. (eds.) ‘Dictionary of Policing’, Willan Publishing

Whitton, E. (1998) ‘The Cartel: Lawyer or attorney and their nine magic tricks’, Tower Books

Wright, A. (2007) in Newburn, T, Williamson, T. And Wright testmyprep, A good. (Eds.) ‘The Handbook of Criminal Investigation’, Willan Publishing

Zander, M. (1995) ‘ The Police and Criminal Evidence Action 1984’, 3rd edition, London: HMSO

Artículos Relacionados


5681 3011

(01) 800 0070 200